NCHC

National Coalition On Health Care

  • About Us
    • Members and Supporters
    • Board of Directors
    • Staff
    • Annual Reports
  • Policy
    • COVID-19 Response
    • Make Prescription Drugs More Affordable
    • Eliminate Surprise Medical Billing
    • Make Health Care Affordable and Accessible
    • Promote a High-Value Health Care System that Supports Vulnerable Populations
  • Blog
  • Events
  • Newsroom
    • Press Releases
    • NCHC In The News
    • Policy Correspondence
    • Fact Sheets & Issue Briefs
  • Get Involved
    • Become a Member
    • Become a Funder
    • Career Opportunities & Internships
  • Contact Us

Obesity and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: By the Numbers

October 29, 2012 By Larry McNeely

Tweet
Share

July 18, 2012

By Nishi Singhal

Obesity is a major public health crisis in the United States affecting:

  • over 1 in 3 of adult men and women
  • about 1 in 5 of children and adolescents

Obesity and its associated problems have a large economic impact on our health care system.

  • $147 billion spent on obesityNearly
  • 10% of all medical spending nationally
  • 1/2 of all Medicare and Medicaid spending

Increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is a key factor driving this growing problem:

  • The consumption of sweetened beverages has increased dramatically in the past thirty years.
  • In 2009, Americans consumed 13.8 billion gallons of sugar-sweetened beverages.
    • That’s 70,000 empty calories per person.

There are several health consequences of obesity:

  • Coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, stroke, etc.
  • Two-thirds of overweight children have at least one cardiovascular risk factor (e.g., hypertension, hyperlipidemia)
  • Type II diabetes mellitus is increasing in youth.

Currently, several states have implemented a sales tax on soda sold at restaurants and vending machines; however, there are no statistically significant differences in obesity prevalence between states without taxes on soda compared to states with taxes with at least a 5% sales tax on soda. Studies have found that an excise tax would be most effective in decreasing consumption versus a sales tax since an excise tax applies to the wholesaler or producer of the SSB and this is directly passed on to the consumer and reflected in the shelf price. Additionally, studies have found that a substantial taxation on sugar-sweetened beverages can reduce consumption:

A study found that a nationwide penny-per-ounce tax on sugar-sweetened beverages would reduce consumption by 15% among adults.  This would prevent:

  • 100,000 cases of heart disease,
  • 8,000 strokes, and
  • 26,000 deaths over the next ten years.
  • 240,000 cases of diabetes a year.

Preventing disease saves money and will improve the health status of Americans:

  • $17.1 billion over the next ten years

Recommendations:

  • Implement a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to reduce consumption and its associated problems.
  • Policymakers should earmark the revenue generated from the tax for obesity prevention programs in order to further reduce associated health problems.

Some legislators and political organizations do not support an excise tax on Sugar Sweetened Beverages because they believe that the tax is regressive and places a burden on working families. However, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is regressive—greater burden on the poor than the rich—with lower income and minority groups consuming more sugary beverages. The tax would actually reduce this disparity by decreasing consumption in these groups and therefore decreasing the health problems associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Additionally, many food companies argue against the tax since they believe it is unethical and the public will not support it. However, roughly one-third to one-half of consumers supports SSB taxes and over two-thirds of the population supports SSB taxes if the revenues will be used for obesity prevention and health promotion.  In all, the benefits of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages outweigh the negatives and the tax should be implemented for the benefit of public health.

 

Nishi Singhal joined the National Coalition on Health Care as a Paul G. Roger Scholar in the Summer 2012 after graduating with a Masters in Public Health in Health Policy and Administration from the University of Illinois at Chicago. Nishi’s interests lie in chronic disease prevention and its role in reducing health care costs. Nishi enjoys traveling abroad, reading and is learning to garden organically.

Filed Under: Uncategorized

Obesity and Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: By the Numbers

July 18, 2012 By Larry McNeely

By Nishi Singhal

Some legislators and political organizations do not support an excise tax on Sugar Sweetened Beverages because they believe that the tax is regressive and places a burden on working families. However, consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is regressive—greater burden on the poor than the rich—with lower income and minority groups consuming more sugary beverages. The tax would actually reduce this disparity by decreasing consumption in these groups and therefore decreasing the health problems associated with consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages.

Read more

Filed Under: Blog

Mission

To bring together key stakeholders in order to achieve an affordable, high-value health care system for patients and consumers, for employers and other payers, and for taxpayers.

Signup for NCHC Newsletter

NCHC Recent Policy Correspondence

  • NCHC STATEMENT ON BICAMERAL AND BIPARTISAN SURPRISE BILLING LEGISLATION, “NO SURPRISES ACT,”
  • NCHC STATEMENT ON PART D REBATE SAFE HARBOR REPEAL AND “MOST FAVORED NATION” DEMONSTRATION
  • NCHC Statement On The Trump Administration’s “Most-Favored-Nation” Drug Pricing Executive Order
  • NCHC Statement on the Trump Administration’s Executive Orders
  • NCHC Statement on the Pricing of Remdesivir
...More Policy Correspondence

National Coalition on Health Care

About Us

The National Coalition on Health Care (NCHC) was formed more than two decades ago to help achieve comprehensive health system change and is currently led by John Rother. We aim to be a leader in promoting a healthy population and a more effective, efficient and responsive health system that provides quality care for all. NCHC is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization of organizations. Our growing Coalition represents more than 80 participating organizations, including medical societies, businesses, unions, health care providers, faith-based associations, pension and health funds, insurers, and groups representing consumers, patients, women, … Read More...

PRESIDENT

John Rother

Interim CEO

Shawn Martin

CHAIRMAN

Jack Lewin
Principal and Founder
Lewin and Associates, LLC

MISSION

To bring together key stakeholders in order to achieve an affordable, high-value health care system for patients and consumers, for employers and other payers, and for taxpayers.

CONTACT US

900 16th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20006
contactus@nchc.org

Connect With NCHC

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Recent News & Posts

  • NCHC Letter to President-Elect Biden’s Transition Team
  • NCHC STATEMENT ON BICAMERAL AND BIPARTISAN SURPRISE BILLING LEGISLATION, “NO SURPRISES ACT,”
  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Communities of Color
  • NCHC Statement On CMS’ “Geographic Direct Contracting” Model
  • NCHC STATEMENT ON PART D REBATE SAFE HARBOR REPEAL AND “MOST FAVORED NATION” DEMONSTRATION

Recent Tweets

Tweets by NC_HC

Copyright © 2021 · Outreach Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in